How often do we hear dire, existential predictions? Why do proponents of a particular policy/ideology always warn that everything is at stake, and everything will be lost if you don’t… (you fill in the blank).
Always look beneath the surface.
- Does this help the speaker get what they want?
- Do they personally benefit from what they want you to do?
- Is the connection from the problem to the solution as strong as they imply?
For example, at a recent board meeting in my shul, people who wanted a specific candidate for rabbi, used the line “this shul is doomed in 5-10 year’s, if we don’t hire this person.”
Once I hear apocalyptic predictions I try to look deeper.
- Does hiring this person guarantee survival?
- Isn’t the root cause of a shul’s demise, a lack of attendance?
- How will this person increase attendance?
- Do the supporters promise to attend more often? Or will it be attended by only the “usual suspects”?
- Weekday services?
- Classes?
- Will YOU step up to work on the day-to-day operations?
In the end, I don’t think people’s behavior will change.
I don’t think this candidate is our savior.
I don’t think our chances for survival improve to the extent being suggested.